As another Champions Trophy slips past the grips of the Proteas, India celebrates another fine tournament – and perhaps they’re built for it. While India might have been a top contender from the start, they weren’t tournament favourites but their preparedness in itself made them an outfit to contend with yet again. They proved to be the best side in the end with finalists England struggling to chase India’s subdued 130 runs.
But let’s get back to the Proteas who again disappointed in the knockout stages of a tournament. While the squad had to deal with the absence of Morkel, injured Steyn and big-hitting Graeme Smith, there was definitely an honest sight of a final with a young but talented team setup. Again, the supposed depth seemed short-lived. With Steyn sitting on the sidelines, the bowling attack just didn’t click and was not as threatening. With no Morkel, too, there was no consistency from the likes of Kleinveldt, Tsotsobe and McLaren. Obvious talent but short of world-class. There seems to be a heavy reliance on the experience of Amla and De Villiers in the middle and when they fail to produce, the squad is left dwindling on youngsters who are new to world tournaments and high-pressure chases.
Its an all too familiar situation for players and fans in a South African context. When the Proteas fall, the media and pundits often throw around the ‘choking’ tag all too easily. And its easy to in my opinion. Perhaps its a matter of history for South Africa. With the talent and world number one status through the years, its strange that we find ourselves without silverware. With the continuous disappointments and knockout panics, its easy to see why there’s a little bit more missing. Where is that psychological need to see a game through? Do we blame the depth, the youngsters, the reliance on a few? Is the dear ‘chokers’ tag something now embedded in our country’s cricket DNA? We always ponder the ‘what-ifs’ and consider a semi-final with a fit Dale Steyn and perhaps a level-headed Smith opening the batting. If only. If only. If only.
There is no real cure for South Africa’s ability to disappoint when it counts. There have been several attempts to resurrect confidence but that’s just tests and appointments that are great in theory but lack when it comes to game time. It’s all about experience in the long run and there needs to be players who will learn and then make amends. It might take a number of years and there will be those that are injured but there needs to be players who hold responsibility. Actually, every player needs to hold that responsibility and a team dynamic needs to be gathered before a trophy can be clinched.
We have the right set-up and talent and AB is slowly moulding his place as a one-day skipper even though he has much to learn. South Africa will have to realise to let Smith and Kallis fall back into Test players while there needs to be options above Steyn and Morkel plonking down bowling stats. Even South African fans feared the worst when Steyn was left out in the semi. With a new coach in Russel Domingo set to take over the reigns, there needs to be some consistency in the shorter formats of the game. We can’t rely on the injury-prone and ageing giants. Then we could get over the choking mentality and ride on the talents of Du Plessis, Ingram, McLaren, Tsotsobe and the like. But its always about dynamic and toughness. Time will tell if South Africa can finally rid that “dark cloud” that Gary Kirsten mentioned.